| Previous | [ 1] | [ 2] | [ 3] | [ 4] | [ 5] | [ 6] | [ 7] | [ 8] | [ 9] | [ 10] | [ 11] | [ 12] | [ 13] | [ 14] | [ 15] | [ 16] | [ 17] | [ 18] | [ 19] |
¡@
Ill-Young Weon, Doo Heon Song+ and Chang-Hoon Lee
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Konkuk University
Seoul 143-701, Korea
E-mail: {clcc; chlee}@konkuk.ac.kr
+Department of Computer Game and Information
Yong-In SongDam Colleage
5771 Mapyong Dong Young-In Kyungki, Korea
E-mail: dsong@ysc.ac.kr
In the field of network intrusion detection, both the signature-based intrusion detection
system and the machine learning-based intrusion detection system possess advantages
and disadvantages. When the two discrepant systems are combined in a way that
the former is used as the main system and the latter as a supporting system, the machine
learning-based intrusion detection system measures the validity of alarms determined by
the signature-based intrusion detection system and filters out any false alarms. What is
more, such an approach can also detect attacks that the signature-based system by itself
cannot detect.
The objective of this paper is to propose a combined model of the signature-based
and machine learning-based intrusion detection systems and to show that the combined
system is more efficient than each individual system. We used the DARPA Data Set in
experiments in order to show the usefulness of the combined model. Snort was used for
the experiment as a signature-based intrusion detection system and extended IBL (Instance-
based Learner) was used as the principal learning algorithm for the machine
learning-based intrusion detection system. To compare performances of the algorithms,
C4.5 was used.
Received October 8, 2004; revised May 5, 2005; accepted June 8, 2005.
Communicated by Ja-Ling Wu.
* This research was supported by the Ministry of Information and Communication (MIC), Korea, under the
Information Technology Research Center (ITRC) support program supervised by the Institute of Information
Technology Assessment (IITA).