[Asiacrypt2025] Your Proof in [978-981-95-5112-5, ASIACRYPT 2025, Part IV, LNCS 16248, paper approval (679527_1_En, Chapter 16)]
Tanja Lange
tanja at hyperelliptic.org
Sat Dec 6 10:32:30 CST 2025
- Previous message (by thread): [Asiacrypt2025] Your Proof in [978-981-95-5112-5, ASIACRYPT 2025, Part IV, LNCS 16248, paper approval (679527_1_En, Chapter 16)]
- Next message (by thread): [Asiacrypt2025] Your Proof in [978-981-95-5112-5, ASIACRYPT 2025, Part IV, LNCS 16248, paper approval (679527_1_En, Chapter 16)]
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Dear Mr. Manigandan,
Thank you for sending the updated pdf. We have checked the changes and are very
happy to see that all of them have been done. Thank you for the uick handling.
We're happy to approve this version.
All the best
Tanja
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 02:41:49PM +0530, Manigandan K Kumar R wrote:
> Dear Dr. Tanja Lange,
>
> I hope this email finds you well.
>
> I would like to inform you that we have incorporated your amendments and
> attached the revised PDF for your final review.
>
> Please check the PDF and provide your comments/approval at the earliest to move
> forward with the publishing process.
>
> Also, the conference will start on December 08 and we must publish this
> proceeding by the end of this week. So it would be very much helpful if you
> could provide your response by today.
>
> Thank you for your help and kind understanding.
>
> ---
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Manigandan K (Mr.)
>
> Production Supervisor - Books Production
>
>
> www.springernature.com
>
> Straive |7th Floor, Block-C | Hardy Tower | Ramanujan IT City | Rajiv Gandhi
> Salai (OMR) |Taramani | Chennai |India-600 113.
>
> M +91 9965087680
>
> manigandank.kumarr at straive.com
>
> ---
> SPi Technologies India Pvt Ltd is a service provider of Springer Nature
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2025 at 07:20, Tanja Lange <tanja at hyperelliptic.org> wrote:
>
> Dear Mr Manigandan,
> I just went to your page to do another check but the page tells me that the
> manuscript has been "implicitly approved". My co-author, Daniel J.
> Bernstein
> says that he had uploaded comments, so it should certainly not be in an
> _approved_ state. Furthermore, it now still is less than 72h after your
> email
> sending us the link. I would also like to point out that the emal was
> malformed
> (see below) and came 4 days after the announced time, (26 Nov instead of 22
> Nov). These, and the timely comments from Bernstein, should be enough to
> grant
> an extension, but mot importantly, the errors need to be fixed. So, please
> send
> us an updated version.
>
> This email covers the same issues submitted through the form and adds
> information, just in case your system really didn't register our
> complaints.
>
> Author information:
> My primary affiliation is Eindhoven University of Technology; Academia
> Sinica
> is only a secondary affiliation. Hence, we had correctly put {3,2} next to
> my
> name. This got changed to {2,3} in the paper and the metadata lists them in
> the
> worng order of priority.
> The locations of displaying the email addresses got changed, also
> indicating
> falsely indicatig Academia Sinica as my main affiliation.
> I'm attaching our version to show that it was correct.
> If your system cannot handle a {3,2} then please change the order of the
> institutions to
> 1 UIC
> 2 TUE
> 3 AS
> so that Bernstein ends up with {1,3}, I end up woth {2,3} and Pellegrini
> with
> {2}. Please algin Pellegrini's and my email address with TUE.
>
> The use of "et al." in the author line at the top of pages is unacceptable.
> All
> author names fit.
> Put "Daniel J. Bernstein, Tanja Lange, and Alex Pellegrini" in the header
> on
> the left pages.
>
> Table 1 is a very important table for this paper and we had ensured that it
> was
> prominently visible on the top of a page. In your version it apppears in
> the
> iddle of the text, right after the meniton, as if we didn't understand how
> to
> use latex properly. I understand that forr displaying the paper on the
> Springer
> link webpage the concept of page does not exist, but for the printed
> version
> and the rendering in pdf it does, so please reinstate the prominent
> posiiton
> that it had.
>
> The same applies for Table 2.
>
> Your editors removed chronological information, and information of what
> relevance we give to the papers we cite, by changing how tations appear in
> the
> text. E.g.
> "see [10], [5], [11], and [6]" is in chronological order and in the order
> in
> which the interested reader should consume these papers. This got changed
> to
> "see [5, 10, 11], and [6]"
> which is giving fale priority to [5]. This is just one example and I fear
> that
> this was some manual process an editor went through, but that means that
> this
> editor now has to go through the manual proecess to revert this.
> I strongly hope that this is not part of your editing guidelines, but if it
> is,
> please remove it. Authors know the works they are citing and we certainly
> are
> able to put numbers in increasing orders if we wanted to, hence, you should
> assume that there is meaning in the ordering and not change it.
>
> The same comment applies to "[42], [27], [20], and [19]".
>
> In Section 7.4, "in Sage" is improperly indented, it is the ending of the
> sentence after the display of a code snippet.
>
> It is absolutely inacceptable to truncate the list of authors in the
> bibliography. Author names in mathematical publications are conventionally
> listed in alphabetical order, making it unethical to specifically broadcast
> a
> "lead" author's name.
> This applies to publications {1], [2], and [3], which, as you can see, are
> ordered alphabeticaly, but I can assure you that Bernstein and me did our
> fair
> share of work for [2] and should get that work acknowledged. Besides the
> issue
> of academic credit, the list of authors is also important to judge the
> level of
> independence of a publication. If we were to portrait [2] in a more
> favorable
> light than [1] or [3] the reader should be able to see that our judgement
> might
> be biased due to involvement in [2].
> I hope this explains why this is a really important issue. If your database
> has
> lost the information on the authors this must be fixed at the root and for
> all
> papers that link to it, not just for those few where the authors take the
> time
> to drag themselves through comparing the bibliography entries.
>
> There is also an "et a;." in the list of editors of [10].
>
> Since you're editing the file again anyways, we would kindly ask to fix two
> typos that we noticed in reviewing the proof.
>
> * Please also insert a semicolon at the end of 3(b) in Algorithm 4.
>
> * Please change "c_{ab}" to "C_{ab}" in [8]
>
> Looking forward to hearing back from you
> Tanja
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 08:05:24AM +0530, manigandank.kumarr at straive.com
> wrote:
> > <style type="text/css">
> > ul{margin:0; padding:0;}
> > </style>
> > <p>Dear Corresponding author,</p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>We are in the process of publishing the <b>ASIACRYPT 2025, Part IV,
> LNCS 16248</b> proceedings. During the publication process the final page
> numbers and running heads are inserted, as is the reference/copyright line
> at the bottom of the first page of the paper. In addition, any formatting
> or capitalization irregularities are corrected and adapted to Springer
> requirements. This way we accommodate your contribution not only for the
> printed version but also for the various full text XML based epub formats.
> </p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>References are also modified to make them compatible with CrossRef,
> which will permit cross referencing within SpringerLink and eventually
> between different publishers and their online databases.</p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>To make sure that no errors have inadvertently been introduced, we
> would ask you to kindly check the final PDF of your paper, paying
> particular attention to the references section. This can be done using our
> e-proofing system. Via the web interface, you can download and check your
> paper. You may then either approve it, or write your comments in the box.
> Send us your reply no later than <b>November 28,2025 23:59 GMT</b>. If you
> have not responded by then, the paper is automatically considered to be
> approved. </p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>Please find below the link to your paper:</p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>https://proofs.straive.com/lncseproofing/download.html?rfp=
> bq3sH3e0112851x16</p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>If your paper has more than one corresponding author, each one will
> receive this email. Please collaborate with the other corresponding author
> (s) And make sure that your common feedback is entered into the eproof
> system by one of you on behalf of all the others. (Please note that
> comments may be entered only once!) Please note that we will only correct
> errors that have been introduced during the publication process. This
> should not be seen as an opportunity to copyedit or modify your paper in
> any way.</p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p>The proof PDF is actually the online PDF which will - besides the
> Fulltext XML based HTML version - be published on Springer Link http://
> link.springer.com. The resolution of the file for the printed book will be
> higher (max. 600 dpi) and any colored figures will be printed in black and
> white.</p>
> > <p></p>
> > <p><b>E-mail address:</b> Please note that we standardly publish
> professional e-mail addresses, but not private ones. If you have a
> different preference regarding publication of your email address, please
> indicate this clearly on the proof.</p>
> > <p>
> >
> > Best wishes,</br>
> > <b>Manigandan K.</b></br>
> > Project Manager - Books Production</p>
> >
> > <span style="color:#20253d"><b>Springer <span style="color:red">Nature</
> b></br>
> > <span style="color:black">
> > Straive, 7th Floor, Block-C, Hardy Tower, Ramanujan IT City, Rajiv Gandhi
> Salai (OMR), Taramani, Chennai-600 113, India</br>
> > M +91 (0) 9965087680</br>
> > manigandank.kumarr at straive.com</br>
> > <a href="http://www.springernature.com">springernature.com</a></br><br>
> > ---</br>
> > Springer Nature advances discovery by publishing robust and insightful
> research, supporting the development of new areas of knowledge and making
> ideas and information accessible around the world. We provide the best
> possible service to the whole research community.</br>
> > ---</br>
>
- Previous message (by thread): [Asiacrypt2025] Your Proof in [978-981-95-5112-5, ASIACRYPT 2025, Part IV, LNCS 16248, paper approval (679527_1_En, Chapter 16)]
- Next message (by thread): [Asiacrypt2025] Your Proof in [978-981-95-5112-5, ASIACRYPT 2025, Part IV, LNCS 16248, paper approval (679527_1_En, Chapter 16)]
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Asiacrypt2025
mailing list